In the book “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman,” Mary Wollstonecraft rejects the notion that women are “fascinating graces.” Instead, she wishes to persuade women to “acquire strength, both of mind and body” and to want to be treated as rational creatures (Wollstonecraft, para. 7).
After reading “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman,” I agree with multiple points that Mary Wollstonecraft made. The main point that I agree with is that women deserve to have an education. I believe that when women are educated, they open new opportunities for themselves. There is proof of this because we are currently seeing that more women are going to college to acquire higher education. I am a part of that number as well as many of the ladies in our class.
I continue to agree with Mary until she says that “if she be not prepared by education to become the companion of man, she will stop the progress of knowledge and virtue” (Wollstonecraft, para. 1). My disagreement continues when Mary continues to say that women need to be educated in order to be good mothers. I don’t think that women need education to attract men and be good mothers. Women are already great by themselves.
Now, I don’t know if Mary actually agrees with those thoughts or if she had to come up with a comprise but I hope it is the latter option. What do you think? I believe that Mary Wollstonecraft’s thoughts were very advanced for her time which makes her an outlier. While I think that her thinking is advanced, I don’t think that Wollstonecraft would fully embrace all of the rights that women should have.
Hi Lidia! I really like the quote that you started your post out with about the strength that women should be striving for. I think women today are still trying to prove that they can do what any man can do. For example, there are three women democratic primaries trying to run for president right now. This is obviously a big step towards women’s rights since we have never had a female president, and Wollstonecraft did not live in this time period to see any woman run for president. I think this helps support her concern about women not getting the same education and not receiving the same opportunities because they did not have as much knowledge as men.
LikeLike
Interesting Post Lidia! I agree with your posts completely. Education was very important in balancing the disparity between the two genders. Back then I agree it is very disappointing, the ignorance they had in thinking women should better themselves for the sole purpose of becoming much more interesting towards their husbands. But I personally have convinced myself that she wrote about educating women for that purpose so if someone read this they would agree because if she went trough the radical way and completely said women can be smarter that men and don’t need a husband to become better; this book would not do so good. Although I did read in the excerpt, her book didn’t do good because she had a very bad reputation and it wasn’t until later that it was appreciated.
LikeLike